FAQ Register Login
 
Latest Discussions Minimize
Widescreen tour slider by Roger Graham
Hi, I have another question regarding the widescreen tour1 presentation. H...
Widescreen tour background by Roger Graham
Hi, I've been trying out the widescreen tour1 presentation but am unable to g...
Posting a Comment produces error by Leather man
Hello When we try to post a comment, the page hangs a,d we receive the follow...
HD Video Buffering by Hank Austin
Are there any tweaks to get HD video to buffer faster? Thanks, Hank
Failure to see the Video by rascariz rascariz
Good afternoon. I have one problem when painting the videos I have this H...
Is it possible to overwrite existing video? by Mark Hannig
Is it possible to re-upload and re-encode a video without having to create a new...
Item has already been added by John Barendrecht
Getting this error in event log, page seems to render OK? InnerException: Ite...
New Installation Issues by Joe Craig
We've purchase Ultra Media Gallery 6.5 - Image Gallery & Slideshow, Professional...
Best file Format and Size to upload. by Jason Thomas
Looked through the forum and could not find anything for my question and the doc...
need serial number again by Mike Morrison
suddenly my UMG v4 is asking for a serial number. Snowcovered is down for som...
Support Forum Minimize
Subject: Photo Size
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
Sue Conant
Posts:35
Golden Member

06/29/2009 9:56 PM  
What size photos do the rest of you upload to your albums and what program do you use to resize them?

I have been using Lightroom which works well but I'm finding that since the photos are usually DNG's when I shrink them to jpg's, resize them to about 700x500 they run between 70 and 200 kb depending on what is in the photos. Busy photos with lots of trees and landscapes are larger. Others average around 100.

When I tried using the batch command in Bridge, to get a decent looking photo it kept them quite large. And when I tried using the "save for web" feature in Photoshop it did a great job reducing the photos, but seemed to corrupt the EXIF data.

I had written before that some of the photos showed the EXIF data and some didn't and when I did some testing the ones that wouldn't show the EXIF data were the ones coming off of "save for web". It was very sporadic. Some would show the info and others would not. When exporting from Lightroom the photos are larger in size but show all the info.

Thought I'd see what others did.

Thanks,
Sue
Pengtsen R
Posts:9386


07/01/2009 12:37 PM  
you also can try to let UMG resize it, for example, your max photo size is set to 800 * 600, you upload your original picture( for example, the picture imported from DC), so UMG will resize them to 800 * 600, and keep the exif data.

you can try it to see if you are satisfied with the photo quality and file size.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
Sue Conant
Posts:35
Golden Member

07/01/2009 12:48 PM  
I have gone back and re-worked the photos and have them at 700x500. That size works the best with the skin I chose. The default size is too small so upped the size a bit. I experiment with the quality finding a happy medium between too large of a kb count and too low which produced a lousy looking photo. This was the easiest to do in Lightroom. Having UMG resize quite often pixelated the original photos. All seems to be working well with using Lightroom and not having Photo Shop do the reduce for web use. Lightroom keeps the exif data.

I'm now adding the up dated photos and all seems to be working well.

Thanks for your help.

Sue
Pengtsen R
Posts:9386


07/01/2009 12:49 PM  
always glad to help!

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Enterprise level DotNetNuke Solutions Copyright © 2005-2010 BizModules   |  Contact Us  |  Terms Of Use   |  Privacy Statement